How Cold War Secrets Impact Today’s Politics

Dr. Chelsea McGee

So, let’s talk about Frank Wisner—a name that doesn’t come up enough, even though he played a massive role in shaping modern intelligence work. And when I say massive, I mean groundbreaking. Early on, Wisner spearheaded the CIA’s covert operations—through the Office of Policy Coordination, which he practically built from the ground up.

Dr. Chelsea McGee

Here’s the thing—back in 1948, the Italian elections were seen as a turning point in the fight against communism. Wisner was instrumental in making sure the election leaned pro-Western. How? By using psychological warfare and leveraging media manipulation in ways that were, well, both genius and a little terrifying. Can you imagine pulling those strings from the shadows?

Dr. Chelsea McGee

Psychological warfare isn’t just about military strategy—it’s about shaping public opinion. For Wisner, it included planting rumors, staging propaganda campaigns, and even smuggling Western media, like The Guardian, into Eastern Europe during the Cold War. I mean, think about it—those efforts outright challenged censorship and helped spread ideas that were otherwise suppressed. But, you’ve gotta ask, at what cost?

Dr. Chelsea McGee

And that's where it gets murky. These covert operations saved lives, supported democracy—or at least that’s one way to frame it. But they also sparked ethical debates that we’re still having today. Like, should we be meddling in other nations’ politics to this extent? Did Wisner’s work set a dangerous precedent? Did the end justify the means?

Dr. Chelsea McGee

The thing is, Wisner wasn’t immune to criticism. The CIA’s controversial actions under his leadership, particularly during the Cold War, drew public scrutiny—rightfully so in some cases. It’s one of those cases where you’ve got this brilliant leader caught up in the complexities of doing what’s ‘necessary’ versus what’s ‘right.’

Dr. Chelsea McGee

And these ethical dilemmas aren’t ancient history. They echo in today’s political strategies, in how governments justify interference, psychological tactics—and, let’s be honest—propaganda. So, the question becomes, have we learned anything from Wisner’s playbook, or are we just remixing it?

Dr. Chelsea McGee

You know, it’s wild to think about how one audacious hoax can expose so much about our entire political system. That’s exactly what a group of liberal satirists did—with what’s now called America’s ‘hoax of the century.’ And honestly, it’s brilliant. They staged this elaborate act that was almost like reverse engineering misinformation, all to critique the way media narratives get built and, of course—how people just eat them up.

Dr. Chelsea McGee

Here’s where it gets tricky, though. Satire doesn’t just poke holes in the system; it walks this fine line between truth and fabrication. So, while it can punch up, it can also blur boundaries in ways that, let’s face it, might end up feeding distrust. Distrust in media, distrust in institutions, in each other. And isn’t that exactly what democracy can’t afford?

Dr. Chelsea McGee

Because think about it—when satire starts playing with misinformation, even if the intention’s good, it risks crossing over into dangerous territory. We’re talking about reinforcing those ‘post-truth’ dynamics where feelings replace facts, where you can dismiss reality as just someone else’s opinion. It’s this slippery slope, is it not?

Dr. Chelsea McGee

But here’s the thing. Humor… it’s transformative. It challenges systems; it disrupts power in ways that feel accessible. That’s what makes satire so powerful—it speaks to everyone. But it can’t exist in a vacuum. Misinformation thrives in the same ecosystem, and, well, they’re kind of feeding off each other, are they not?

Dr. Chelsea McGee

So, the big question here is, how do we separate satire that reveals truth from satire that distorts it? And maybe even more importantly, how do we as a society—that’s so flooded with information—know the difference anymore?

Dr. Chelsea McGee

Here’s the wild thing about history—it doesn’t just inform today. It kind of repeats itself, right? Take Cold War disinformation strategies, for instance. If you compare what happened then to what’s happening now, the parallels are, honestly, chilling. Back then, it was all about planting seeds of doubt, shaping narratives through media. And today? Well, isn’t that just amplified times a thousand on social platforms?

Dr. Chelsea McGee

Look at Russian interference in the 2016 elections—same playbook, different tools. They exploited existing divisions, flooded spaces with fake stories. It’s like, how much can you overwhelm people until they stop knowing what to believe? And let’s admit it, the Cold War masters of disinformation would’ve been, I don’t know, kind of impressed.

Dr. Chelsea McGee

But we didn’t just inherit those strategies—we’ve supercharged them. Enter artificial intelligence. And that opens up a whole new can of worms. AI can create fake videos, mimic voices. I mean, think about it—AI technology can manufacture ‘proof’ for disinformation campaigns faster than we can fact-check it. How do you even begin to regulate that?

Dr. Chelsea McGee

And then there’s the ethics—because, sure, you could use AI to expose lies, but how far do we let that go before it crosses its own line? Are we just falling into a tech-fueled arms race of deception? It’s like the Cold War, but the stakes feel bigger, more… digital. And when trust is already fragile, do we really want to gamble with that?

Dr. Chelsea McGee

So, what’s the solution here? Well, let’s circle back to history. The Cold War taught us that you can’t fight disinformation with more secrecy. It’s about resilience, about building public trust. Democracies need transparency, accountability—the kind of stuff that prevents manipulation from taking root in the first place. But how do we make sure those lessons stick in a world that’s drowning in information? We must also take into account The New Cold Wars, yes, the New Cold Wars. Let's take a look at this clip of David Sanger speaking about the new cold wars, it's very real and present threat, and how many past and present presidents are guilty of wishful thinking. Play this clip.

Dr. Chelsea McGee

And that wraps it up for today’s episode of The Real 4 one one. I just want to take a moment to say thank you—thank you to every single one of you who tuned in, who listens, who thinks about these conversations long after the episode ends. Honestly, you’re the reason we do this.

Dr. Chelsea McGee

If you found today’s discussion valuable—if it sparked something in you or made you see the world just a little differently—then hey, share it. Share the podcast with a friend, with your coworker, even with, I don’t know, that one person in your life who always says, ‘Why does this even matter?’ Because these conversations matter. They really do.

Dr. Chelsea McGee

And don’t forget to follow us on all the socials, drop a comment, and let us know what you wanna hear next. What’s on your mind? What keeps you up at night? Those are the stories we wanna dive into. Oh, and make sure you subscribe to our email newsletter—because, trust me, we’ve got some exclusive content coming your way that you don’t wanna miss.

Dr. Chelsea McGee

Now, if you believe in independent media—the kind that digs deeper, asks the hard questions, and doesn’t just settle for the headline—please consider supporting us. The Real 4 one one is on Substack and Fanbase, where we offer free and paid subscriptions. Every bit of support helps us keep doing this, keep digging into the truths that matter.

Dr. Chelsea McGee

So, until next time—stay informed, stay bold, and stay real. Because, at the end of the day, the story is never just the headline. Talk to you soon.